Section 1. Section 54-33a of the general statutes is repealed and the following is substituted in lieu thereof (Effective October 1, 2014):

(a) As used in sections 54-33a to 54-33g, as amended by this act, inclusive, "property" includes, without limitation, documents, books, papers, films, recordings, electronic records or data, and any other tangible thing; “tracking device” means an electronic or mechanical device which permits the tracking of the movement of a person or object.

(b) Upon complaint on oath by any state's attorney or assistant state's attorney or by any two credible persons, to any judge of the Superior Court or judge trial referee, that such state's attorney or assistant state's attorney or such persons have probable cause to believe that any property (1) possessed, controlled, designed or intended for use or which is or has been used or which may be used as the means of committing any criminal offense; or (2) which was stolen or embezzled; or (3) which constitutes evidence of an offense, or that a particular person participated in the commission of an offense, is within or upon any place, thing or person, such judge or judge trial referee, except as provided in section 54-33j, may issue a warrant commanding a proper officer to enter into or upon such place or thing, search the same or the person and take into such officer's custody all such property named in the warrant.

(c) Upon complaint on oath by any state's attorney or assistant state's attorney or by any two credible persons, to any judge of the Superior Court or judge trial referee, that such state's attorney or assistant state's attorney or such persons have probable cause to believe that a criminal offense has been, is being, or will be committed and that the use of a tracking device will yield evidence of the commission of that offense, such judge or judge trial referee, may issue a warrant authorizing the installation and use of a tracking device.  The complaint shall identify the person, or property to, in or on which the tracking device is to be attached, placed, or installed, and, if known, the owner of such property.    

[(c)](d) A warrant may issue only on affidavit sworn to by the complainant or complainants before the judge or judge trial referee and establishing the grounds for issuing the warrant, which affidavit shall be part of the arrest file. If the judge or judge trial referee is satisfied that grounds for the application exist or that there is probable cause to believe that they exist, the judge or judge trial referee shall issue a warrant identifying the property and naming or describing the person, place or thing to be searched or authorizing the installation and use of a tracking device and naming the person or property to, in, or on which the tracking device is to be attached, placed, attached, placed, or installed. The warrant shall be directed to any police officer of a regularly organized police department or any state police officer, to an inspector in the Division of Criminal Justice or to a conservation officer, special conservation officer or patrolman acting pursuant to section 26-6. The warrant shall state the date and time of its issuance and the grounds or probable cause for its issuance and shall command the officer to search within a reasonable time the person, place or thing named, for the property specified. A warrant for a tracking device shall state the date and time of its issuance and the grounds or probable cause for its issuance and shall command the officer to complete the installation of the device within a specified period no longer than ten days and authorize the use of the tracking device, including the collection of data therefrom, for a reasonable period of time not to exceed thirty days from the date it is installed. Upon request and a showing of good cause, a judge or judge trial referee may authorize the use and monitoring of the tracking device for an additional period of thirty days. The inadvertent failure of the issuing judge or judge trial referee to state on the warrant the time of its issuance shall not in and of itself invalidate the warrant.

(e) A judge or judge trial referee may issue a warrant for records or data that are in the actual or constructive possession of a foreign corporation or entity that transacts business in this state, including one that provides electronic communication services or remote computing services to the public. Such a warrant may be served on an authorized representative of the foreign corporation or entity by hand, mail, overnight delivery, facsimile, or electronically provided proof of delivery can be established.  When properly served with a warrant issued pursuant to this section, the foreign corporation or entity shall provide to the applicant all records or data sought by the warrant within five business days of receipt, unless the judge or judge trial referee determines that a shorter or longer period of time is necessary or appropriate.

Sec. 2. Section 54-33c of the general statutes is repealed and the following is substituted in lieu thereof (Effective October 1, 2014):.

(a) The applicant for the search warrant shall file the application for the warrant and all affidavits upon which the warrant is based with the clerk of the court for the geographical area within which any person who may be arrested in connection with or subsequent to the execution of the search warrant would be presented with the return of the warrant. The warrant, except for a warrant for the installation and use of a tracking device, shall be executed within ten days and returned with reasonable promptness consistent with due process of law and shall be accompanied by a written inventory of all property seized. Except for a warrant for the installation and use of a tracking device, [A] a copy of such warrant shall be given to the owner or occupant of the dwelling, structure, motor vehicle or place designated therein, or the person named therein. Except for a warrant for installation and use of a tracking device, [Within] within forty-eight hours of such search, a copy of the application for the warrant and a copy of all affidavits upon which the warrant is based shall be given to such owner, occupant or person. The judge or judge trial referee may, by order, dispense with the requirement of giving a copy of the affidavits to such owner, occupant or person at such time if the applicant for the warrant files a detailed affidavit with the judge or judge trial referee which demonstrates to the judge or judge trial referee that (1) the personal safety of a confidential informant would be jeopardized by the giving of a copy of the affidavits at such time, or (2) the search is part of a continuing investigation which would be adversely affected by the giving of a copy of the affidavits at such time, or (3) the giving of such affidavits at such time would require disclosure of information or material prohibited from being disclosed by chapter 959a. If the judge or judge trial referee dispenses with the requirement of giving a copy of the affidavits at such time, such order shall not affect the right of such owner, occupant or person to obtain such copy at any subsequent time. No such order shall limit the disclosure of such affidavits to the attorney for a person arrested in connection with or subsequent to the execution of a search warrant unless, upon motion of the prosecuting authority within two weeks of such person's arraignment, the court finds that the state's interest in continuing nondisclosure substantially outweighs the defendant's right to disclosure. A warrant for the installation and use of a tracking device shall be returned with reasonable promptness after the period authorized for tracking, including any extensions, has expired.  Within ten days after the use of the tracking device has ended, a copy of the warrant for the installation and use of a tracking device shall be given to the person who was tracked and/or the owner of the property to, in, or on which the tracking device was attached, placed, or installed.  Upon a showing that (1) the personal safety of a confidential informant would be jeopardized by the giving of a copy of the affidavits at such time, or (2) the search is part of a continuing investigation which would be adversely affected by the giving of a copy of the affidavits at such time, or (3) the giving of such affidavits at such time would require disclosure of information or material prohibited from being disclosed by chapter 959a a judge or judge trial referee may dispense with the requirement that a copy of a warrant for the installation and use of a tracking device be given to the person who was tracked and/or the owner of the property to, in, or on which the tracking device was attached, placed, or installed. 

(b) Any order dispensing with the requirement of giving a copy of the warrant application and accompanying affidavits to such owner, occupant or person within forty-eight hours shall be for a specific period of time, not to exceed two weeks beyond the date the warrant is executed. Within that time period the prosecuting authority may seek an extension of such period. Upon the execution and return of the warrant, affidavits which have been the subject of such an order shall remain in the custody of the clerk's office in a secure location apart from the remainder of the court file.

Statement of Purpose:

To revise the law regarding search warrants to address issues raised in State v. Esarey, 308 Conn. 819 (2013) regarding extraterritorial warrants and United States v. Jones, 565 U.S. _____ (2012) regarding the use of global positioning system (GPS) tracking devices.

[Proposed deletions are enclosed in brackets. Proposed additions are indicated by underline, except that when the entire text of a bill or resolution or a section of a bill or resolution is new, it is not underlined.]