2020 CRB Opinions

pertaining to

Sec. 31-301. Factual findings.

 

CRB OPINIONS ARE PROVIDED IN PDF FORMAT  : : :  ALL LINKS OPEN IN A NEW BROWSER TAB
Compensation Review Board opinions are presented for informational purposes only — “as is” — and the Commission makes no warranties regarding their usefulness for any given purpose. As always, the full texts of statutes, regulations, opinions, and court decisions should be consulted and all citations and references fully researched by the reader.

 

Arrico v. Stamford
Case No. 6345 CRB-7-19-9  —  November 17, 2020


Bernard v. ShopRite Supermarket
Case No. 6328 CRB-4-19-5  —  October 15, 2020


Borrero v. Ryder Integrated Services
Case No. 6354 CRB-5-19-10  —  October 16, 2020


Clark v. Waterford
Case No. 6339 CRB-2-19-7  —  July 15, 2020


Connors v. American Frozen Foods, Inc.
Case No. 6326 CRB-4-19-5  —  April 3, 2020


Diaz v. Bridgeport
Case No. 6333 CRB-4-19-6  —  April 29, 2020


Dipisa v. Bethel Health & Rehabilitation Center
Case No. 6334 CRB-7-19-6  —  September 23, 2020


Galinski v. Beaver Tree Service, L.L.C.
Case No. 6361 CRB-1-19-12  —  December 9, 2020


Gfeller v. Big Y Foods
Case No. 6322 CRB-2-19-5  —  April 8, 2020


LeFevre v. TPC Associates, Inc.
Case No. 6297 CRB 4-18-11  —  January 17, 2020


Mascendaro v. Fairfield
Case No. 6304 CRB-4-19-1  —  March 13, 2020


Orzech v. Giacco Oil Company
Case Nos. 6307 CRB-8-19-2 & 6308  —  January 30, 2020


Reveron v. Compass Group
Case No. 6358 CRB-5-19-11  —  September 16, 2020


Schreckengost v. Zwally Hauling
Case No. 6323 CRB-4-19-5  —  July 15, 2020


Secula v. SBC/SNET
Case No. 6314 CRB-5-19-3  —  March 10, 2020


Smith v. RegalCare of Waterbury, LLC
Case No. 6316 CRB-5-19-3  —  March 10, 2020


Tedesco v. Bridgeport
Case No. 6312 CRB-4-19-3  —  March 3, 2020


 

The Workers' Compensation Commission recommends the use of Adobe's free Adobe Acrobat Reader software application when accessing CRB Opinions in PDF format.

Get the Adobe Acrobat Reader by clicking the following button:   Get Adobe Acrobat Reader

The Workers' Compensation Commission's recommendation of Adobe's free Adobe Acrobat Reader software application is based solely on technical considerations inherent in the PDF files this agency produces, and does not constitute an endorsement of Adobe Software as a company or of its commercially-available products. There are a multitude of free and commercial software applications offered by various software makers that are capable of opening and displaying our PDF documents, but only the Adobe Acrobat Reader application makes full and accurate use of the capabilities we have built into our documents; the agency has found over a period of many years that the Adobe Acrobat Reader provides the best, most trouble-free experience using this Commission's PDF files.