2019 CRB Opinions by Case Name
Compensation Review Board opinions are presented for informational purposes only — “as is” — and the Commission makes no warranties regarding their usefulness for any given purpose. As always, the full texts of statutes, regulations, opinions, and court decisions should be consulted and all citations and references fully researched by the reader.
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
Arlio v. Trumbull
Case No. 6284 CRB 4-18-8 — July 25, 2019
Ayala-Lopez v. FMP Transport, L.L.C.
Case No. 6275 CRB-4-18-5 — May 23, 2019
Ayna v. Graebel/CT Movers, Inc.
Case No. 6214 CRB 7-17-8 — March 6, 2019
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
Brennan v. City of Waterbury
Case No. 6065 CRB-5-15-12 — May 16, 2019
Biggs v. Combined Insurance Company of America
Case No. 6247 CRB 7-18-2 — April 12, 2019
Brocuglio v. Thompsonville Fire District #2
Case No. 6165 CRB-1-16-12 — July 17, 2019
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
Caye v. ThyssenKrupp Elevator
Case No. 6296 CRB-1-18-11 — October 29, 2019
Chadbourne v. State/DMHAS
Case No. 6243 CRB-5-18-1 — January 8, 2019
Collin v. United Technologies Corp.
Case No. 6278 CRB-8-18-5 — May 13, 2019
Costanzo v. Stamford
Case No. 6274 CRB-7-18-5 — May 3, 2019
Cote v. Lowe's Home Centers, Inc.
Case No. 6302 CRB-1-18-12 — January 3, 2019
Coughlin v. City of Stamford Fire Department
Case No. 6218 CRB-5-17-9 — February 15, 2019
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
DeLorge v. Norwich
Case No. 6286 CRB-2-18-8 — August 5, 2019
DeMattia v. Dunkin Donuts
Case No. 6289 CRB 4-18-9 — August 27, 2019
Dominguez-Sanchez v. Ta Caislean, Inc.
Case No. 6266 CRB-5-18-4 — March 28, 2019
Drouin v. Satellite Tool Machine Company
Case No. 6310 CRB-1-19-2 — February 26, 2019
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
—
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
Frantzen v. Davenport Electric
Case No. 6091 CRB-4-16-4 — November 4, 2019
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
Gentle v. Stamford
Case No. 6264 CRB 3-18-4 — May 30, 2019
Gould v. City of Stamford
Case No. 6063 CRB-7-15-12 — April 4, 2019
Greco v. Precision Devices, Inc.
Case No. 6265 CRB-8-18-4 — June 17, 2019
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
Hyde v. Branson UltraSonics Corp.
Case No. 6282 CRB-7-18-7 — July 10, 2019
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
—
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
Jackson v. Yale University
Case No. 6273 CRB-5-18-5 — April 4, 2019
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
Kenneson v. RegalCare at Waterbury, L.L.C.
Case No. 6320 CRB-5-19-4 — May 8, 2019
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
Lefevre v. TPC Associates, Inc.
Case No. 6255 CRB-4-18-3 — March 26, 2019
Letaj v. ATMI, Inc.
Case No. 6186 CRB-5-17-4 — January 11, 2019
Lionetti v. Paul G. Messineo, L.L.C.
Case No. 6207 CRB-7-17-7 — June 7, 2019
Lopez v. First Group America, Inc.
Case No. 6305 CRB-3-19-1 — December 11, 2019
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
Malinowski v. Sikorsky Aircraft Corp.
Case No. 6216 CRB-8-17-8 — August 26, 2019
Mangione v. West Hartford
Case No. 6268 CRB-6-18-4 — April 12, 2019
Martinoli v. Stamford Police Dept.
Case No. 6271 CRB-7-18-5 — April 24, 2019
Mauriello v. Craftsmen Litho
Case No. 6256 CRB-5-18-3 — March 22, 2019
Mellado v. Anthony Urbano/Earth Materials, L.L.C.
Case No. 6187 CRB-3-17-4 — January 15, 2019
Morton v. Express Employment Services
Case No. 6300 CRB-8-18-12 — October 31, 2019
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
Nichols v. Advanced Polymer Repairs
Case No. 6306 CRB-3-19-1 — November 15, 2019
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
—
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
Perry v. Danbury
Case No. 6209 CRB-4-17-8 — February 25, 2019
Prairie v. UTC/UTAS/Hamilton Sunstrand
Case No. 6303 CRB-1-19-1 — November 21, 2019
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
—
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
Rock v. University of Connecticut
Case No. 6237 CRB-8-18-1 — October 17, 2019
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
Shelesky v. Community Systems, Inc.
Case No. 6263 CRB-5-18-4 — July 3, 2019
Slade v. Accurate Staffing, LLC
Case No. 6290 CRB-8-18-9 — August 28, 2019
Swaggerty v. Hartford
Case No. 6262 CRB-1-18-4 — March 15, 2019
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
Tanner v. Murace Plumbing Co., Inc.
Case No. 6279 CRB-4-18-6 — June 13, 2019
Terracciano v. LEARN
Case No. 6325 CRB-2-19-5 — May 29, 2019
Thorn v. Utz Quality Foods, Inc.
Case No. 6253 CRB-5-18-03 — July 18, 2019
Tomaszek v. Norton’s Auto & Marine Service, Inc.
Case No. 6249 CRB-1-18-3 — March 1, 2019
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
—
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
Vitti v. Milford
Case No. 6246 CRB-4-18-2 — January 17, 2019
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
Wilson v. Stamford
Case No. 6309 CRB 7-19-2 — December 13, 2019
Woodbury-Correa v. Reflexite Corporation
Case No. 6032 CRB-6-15-9 — July 12, 2019
Woodmansee v. General Dynamics Corp.
Case No. 6252 CRB 8-18-3 — September 11, 2019
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
—
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
Young v. North American Family Institute
Case No. 6350 CRB-5-19-10 — October 8, 2019
Young v. Tradesource, Inc.
Case No. 6285 CRB 4-18-8 — September 18, 2019
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
—
The Workers' Compensation Commission recommends the use of Adobe's free Adobe Acrobat Reader software application when accessing CRB Opinions in PDF format.
Get the Adobe Acrobat Reader by clicking the following button: 
The Workers' Compensation Commission's recommendation of Adobe's free Adobe Acrobat Reader software application is based solely on technical considerations inherent in the PDF files this agency produces, and does not constitute an endorsement of Adobe Software as a company or of its commercially-available products. There are a multitude of free and commercial software applications offered by various software makers that are capable of opening and displaying our PDF documents, but only the Adobe Acrobat Reader application makes full and accurate use of the capabilities we have built into our documents; the agency has found over a period of many years that the Adobe Acrobat Reader provides the best, most trouble-free experience using this Commission's PDF files.