2016 CRB Opinions
pertaining to
Sec. 31-294d. Medical treatment; physician authorization; pecuniary liability.
Compensation Review Board opinions are presented for informational purposes only — “as is” — and the Commission makes no warranties regarding their usefulness for any given purpose. As always, the full texts of statutes, regulations, opinions, and court decisions should be consulted and all citations and references fully researched by the reader.
Allen v. Connecticut Transit
Case No. 6036 CRB-3-15-9 — June 9, 2016
Diaz v. State of Connecticut/Department of Social Services South Central Region
Case No. 6072 CRB-3-16-1 — December 22, 2016
Kladanjcic v. Woodlake at Tolland
Case No. 5995 CRB-1-15-3 — March 2, 2016
Petrini v. Marcus Dairy, Inc.
Case No. 6021 CRB-7-15-7 — May 12, 2016
Tedesco v. City of Bridgeport - Board of Education
Case No. 6054 CRB-4-15-11 — September 14, 2016
Zbras v. Northeast Mortgage Corp.
Case No. 5997 CRB-5-15-3 — March 29, 2016
Zbras v. Northeast Mortgage Corp.
Case No. 5997 CRB-5-15-3 — May 5, 2016
The Workers' Compensation Commission recommends the use of Adobe's free Adobe Acrobat Reader software application when accessing CRB Opinions in PDF format.
Get the Adobe Acrobat Reader by clicking the following button: 
The Workers' Compensation Commission's recommendation of Adobe's free Adobe Acrobat Reader software application is based solely on technical considerations inherent in the PDF files this agency produces, and does not constitute an endorsement of Adobe Software as a company or of its commercially-available products. There are a multitude of free and commercial software applications offered by various software makers that are capable of opening and displaying our PDF documents, but only the Adobe Acrobat Reader application makes full and accurate use of the capabilities we have built into our documents; the agency has found over a period of many years that the Adobe Acrobat Reader provides the best, most trouble-free experience using this Commission's PDF files.