2015 CRB Opinions

pertaining to

Sec. 31-301. Factual findings.


Compensation Review Board opinions are presented for informational purposes only — “as is” — and the Commission makes no warranties regarding their usefulness for any given purpose. As always, the full texts of statutes, regulations, opinions, and court decisions should be consulted and all citations and references fully researched by the reader.


Balloli v. City of New Haven Police Department
Case No. 5950 CRB-6-14-7  —  July 1, 2015

Bedard v. Town of Southbury
Case No. 5923 CRB-5-14-3  —  April 24, 2015

Camp v. Lupin Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Case No. 5936 CRB-6-14-5  —  April 24, 2015

Chantec v. Fabian Lima d/b/a Magic Touch Window Cleaning and Phillip M. Fourtin, Magic Touch Services, LLC
Case No. 5908 CRB-4-14-2  —  April 29, 2015

Haines v. Turbine Technologies, Inc.
Case No. 5932 CRB-6-14-4  —  March 9, 2015

Hatcher v. State of Connecticut University of Connecticut Health Center
Case No. 5903 CRB-1-13-12  —  January 22, 2015

Holston v. City of New Haven Police Department
Case No. 5940 CRB-3-14-5  —  May 27, 2015

Kohn v. Town of Wilton
Case No. 5894 CRB-7-13-11  —  March 11, 2015

Micale v. State of Connecticut Dept. of Emergency Services and Public Protection
Case No. 5910 CRB-6-14-2  —  January 8, 2015

Nelson v. Revera, Inc.
Case No. 5977 CRB-5-15-1  —  September 21, 2015

Noriega v. Jeremy Rosa d/b/a Pristine Properties & Landscaping
Case No. 5952 CRB-7-14-7  —  October 21, 2015

Pisaturo v. Logistec, USA, Inc.
Case No. 5979 CRB-03-14-12  —  September 23, 2015

Raphael v. Connecticut Ballet, Inc.
Case No. 5985 CRB-7-15-2  —  December 10, 2015

Sanchez v. Edson Manufacturing
Case No. 5980 CRB-6-15-1  —  October 6, 2015

Tarantino v. Sears Roebuck & Co.
Case No. 5939 CRB-4-14-5  —  April 13, 2015

Tarantino v. Sears Roebuck & Co.
Case No. 5939 CRB-4-14-5  —  May 12, 2015

Williams v. Jewish Home for the Aged
Case No. 5938 CRB-3-14-4  —  March 16, 2015

Zezima v. City of Stamford
Case No. 5918 CRB-7-14-3  —  May 12, 2015


The Workers' Compensation Commission recommends the use of Adobe's free Adobe Acrobat Reader software application when accessing CRB Opinions in PDF format.

Get the Adobe Acrobat Reader by clicking the following button:   Get Adobe Acrobat Reader

The Workers' Compensation Commission's recommendation of Adobe's free Adobe Acrobat Reader software application is based solely on technical considerations inherent in the PDF files this agency produces, and does not constitute an endorsement of Adobe Software as a company or of its commercially-available products. There are a multitude of free and commercial software applications offered by various software makers that are capable of opening and displaying our PDF documents, but only the Adobe Acrobat Reader application makes full and accurate use of the capabilities we have built into our documents; the agency has found over a period of many years that the Adobe Acrobat Reader provides the best, most trouble-free experience using this Commission's PDF files.