2022 CRB Opinions by Case Name

 

CRB OPINIONS ARE PROVIDED IN PDF FORMAT  : : :  ALL LINKS OPEN IN A NEW BROWSER TAB
Compensation Review Board opinions are presented for informational purposes only — “as is” — and the Commission makes no warranties regarding their usefulness for any given purpose. As always, the full texts of statutes, regulations, opinions, and court decisions should be consulted and all citations and references fully researched by the reader.

 

 


A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M   N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   X   Y   Z


 


A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M   N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   X   Y   Z


Bell v. Hartford Healthcare At Home
Case No. 6473 CRB-8-22-4  —  November 28, 2022


Berry v. Up Realty, L.L.C, Uplift Contracting Inc., and Handson Contracting, Inc.
Case No. 6460 CRB-8-21-12  —  November 9, 2022


Brennan v. City of Waterbury
Case No. 6430 CRB-5-21-6  —  April 11, 2022


Brown v. Coca Cola Bottling Company
Case No. 6456 CRB-1-21-12  —  September 23, 2022

 


A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M   N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   X   Y   Z


Callahan v. Healthcare Services Group-Meriden Care Center
Case No. 6453 CRB-8-21-11  —  June 6, 2022


Callahan v. Healthcare Services Group-Meriden Care Center
Case No. 6453 CRB-8-21-11  —  June 6, 2022


Caye v. Thyssenkrupp Elevator
Case No. 6442 CRB-1-21-9  —  September 16, 2022


Chalifoux v. Crossings East Health & Rehab Center
Case No. 6422 CRB-2-21-5  —  April 4, 2022


Cochran v. State of Connecticut/Department of Transportation
Case No. 6425 CRB-3-21-5  —  May 6, 2022


Coviello v. Ronald Conroy
Case No. 6457 CRB-5-21-12  —  June 16, 2022

 


A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M   N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   X   Y   Z


Dahle v. Stop & Shop Companies, Inc.
Case No. 6435 CRB-6-21-7  —  April 1, 2022

 


A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M   N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   X   Y   Z


Eastwood v. ICNO Painting, Inc.
Case No. 6446 CRB-1-21-10  —  October 14, 2022

 


A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M   N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   X   Y   Z


 


A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M   N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   X   Y   Z


Gardner v. State/Dept. of Mental Health & Addiction Services
Case No. 6434 CRB-5-21-6  —  June 3, 2022

 


A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M   N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   X   Y   Z


 


A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M   N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   X   Y   Z


 


A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M   N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   X   Y   Z


Jinks v. Stop & Shop Supermarket Companies, LLC/Ahold USA
Case No. 6462 CRB-6-21-12  —  January 4, 2022

 


A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M   N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   X   Y   Z


 


A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M   N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   X   Y   Z


Lazu v. State/Dept. of Children and Families
6433 CRB-8-21-6  —  February 18, 2022

 


A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M   N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   X   Y   Z


Martinoli v. Stamford
6420 CRB-7-21-3  —  January 11, 2022


Mikulski v. A. Duie Pyle, Inc.
Case No. 6448 CRB-7-21-11  —  August 8, 2022

 


A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M   N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   X   Y   Z


Nasser v. Premier Limousine of Hartford
Case No. 6463 CRB-6-21-12  —  December 30, 2022


Nordby v. Town of Watertown/Board of Education
Case No. 6445 CRB-5-21-9  —  September 2, 2022

 


A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M   N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   X   Y   Z


 


A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M   N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   X   Y   Z


Preece v. City of New Britain
Case No. 6468 CRB-6-22-2  —  December 28, 2022 

 


A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M   N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   X   Y   Z


 


A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M   N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   X   Y   Z


Riggins v. State of Connecticut/Department of Correction
Case No. 6452 CRB-6-21-11  —  August 8, 2022

 


A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M   N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   X   Y   Z


 


A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M   N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   X   Y   Z


Tinnerello v. Electric Boat Corporation
Case No. 6437 CRB-2-21-7   —   June 16, 2022


Torres v. City of Hartford
Case No. 6458 CRB-6-21-12  —  May 31, 2022

 


A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M   N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   X   Y   Z


 


A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M   N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   X   Y   Z


 


A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M   N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   X   Y   Z


White v. City of Waterbury/Fire Department
Case No. 6441 CRB-5-21-9  —  May 31, 2022


Wilson v. Yale University
Case No. 6459 CRB-4-21-12  —  May 9, 2022


Wilson v. Yale University
Case No. 6459 CRB-4-21-12  —  September 12, 2022

 


A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M   N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   X   Y   Z


 


A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M   N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   X   Y   Z


 


A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M   N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   X   Y   Z


 

 


 

The Workers' Compensation Commission recommends the use of Adobe's free Adobe Acrobat Reader software application when accessing CRB Opinions in PDF format.

Get the Adobe Acrobat Reader by clicking the following button:   Get Adobe Acrobat Reader

The Workers' Compensation Commission's recommendation of Adobe's free Adobe Acrobat Reader software application is based solely on technical considerations inherent in the PDF files this agency produces, and does not constitute an endorsement of Adobe Software as a company or of its commercially-available products. There are a multitude of free and commercial software applications offered by various software makers that are capable of opening and displaying our PDF documents, but only the Adobe Acrobat Reader application makes full and accurate use of the capabilities we have built into our documents; the agency has found over a period of many years that the Adobe Acrobat Reader provides the best, most trouble-free experience using this Commission's PDF files.