2018 CRB Opinions by Case Name

 

CRB OPINIONS ARE PROVIDED IN PDF FORMAT  : : :  ALL LINKS OPEN IN A NEW BROWSER TAB
Compensation Review Board opinions are presented for informational purposes only — “as is” — and the Commission makes no warranties regarding their usefulness for any given purpose. As always, the full texts of statutes, regulations, opinions, and court decisions should be consulted and all citations and references fully researched by the reader.

 

 


A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M   N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   X   Y   Z


 


A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M   N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   X   Y   Z


Bagley v. Gardner Heights Health Care Center, Inc.
Case No. 6140 CRB-4-16-10  —  June 28, 2018


Bajramovic v. First Student
Case No. 6225 CRB-1-17-10  —  October 1, 2018


Banks v. HCR Manor Care, Inc.
Case No. 6227 CRB-6-17-10  —  October 3, 2018


Bard v. Grade A Shoprite of Southbury
Case No. 6194 CRB-1-17-5  —  October 3, 2018

 


A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M   N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   X   Y   Z


Callaghan v. Car Parts International, L.L.C.
Case No. 5992 CRB-1-15-3  —  August 1, 2018


Cariello v. Home Health Care Services, Inc.
Case No. 5959 CRB-8-14-9  —  June 12, 2018


Cassella v. O & G Industries
Case No. 6017 CRB-4-15-5  —  June 27, 2018


Cortes v. State of Connecticut/Judicial Branch
Case No. 6195 CRB-2-17-5  —  July 20, 2018

 


A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M   N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   X   Y   Z


Dabbo v. Beckman Coulter, Inc.
Case No. 6174 CRB-2-17-1  —  March 6, 2018


DeJesus v. R.P.M. Enterprises, Inc. and/or Robert M. Marion, Sr.
Case No. 6201 CRB-1-17-7  —  November 8, 2018


DeLoreto v. Union City Steel, Inc.
Case No. 6120 CRB-8-16-7  —  September 19, 2018


Dias v. Webster Financial Corporation/Webster Bank N.A.
Case No. 6153 CRB-4-16-11  —  February 15, 2018


Dickerson v. City of Stamford
Case No. 6215 CRB-7-17-8  —  September 12, 2018


Dickerson v. City of Stamford
Case No. 6215 CRB-7-17-8  —  October 24, 2018


Dominguez v. New York Sports Club
Case No. 6210 CRB-7-17-8  —  August 28, 2018


Dunkling v. Lawrence Brunoli, Inc. et al.
Case No. 6154 CRB-5-16-11  —  April 25, 2018

 


A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M   N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   X   Y   Z


 


A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M   N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   X   Y   Z


Fernandes v. Town of Darien/Board of Education
Case No. 6211 CRB-3-17-8  —  November 2, 2018


Francis v. Baymont Inn & Suites
Case No. 6239 CRB-1-18-1  —  December 11, 2018


Francis v. Key Human Services, Inc.
Case No. 6240 CRB-5-17-12  —  January 31, 2018


Frantzen v. Davenport Electric
Case No. 5771 CRB-4-12-8  —  July 20, 2018

 


A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M   N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   X   Y   Z


Garthwait v. AT&T
Case No. 6172 CRB-5-17-2  —  February 2, 2018


Gustafson v. SNET/Southern New England Telecommunications et al.
Case No. 6191 CRB-2-17-4  —  April 13, 2018

 


A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M   N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   X   Y   Z


Hankard v. State of Connecticut Division of Criminal Justice/Office of the Chief State’s Attorney
Case No. 6226 CRB-8-17-10  —  October 17, 2018


Hemingway v. State of Connecticut/Dept. of Developmental Services - West Region
Case No. 6241 CRB-5-17-12  —  February 5, 2018

 


A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M   N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   X   Y   Z


 


A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M   N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   X   Y   Z


 


A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M   N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   X   Y   Z


Keyes v. Town of Branford
Case No. 6183 CRB-3-17-3  —  April 25, 2018


Korn v. Town of Guilford
Case No. 6178 CRB-3-17-3  —  March 21, 2018


Kuzara v. State of Connecticut University of Connecticut
Case No. 6166 CRB-2-16-12  —  May 8, 2018

 


A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M   N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   X   Y   Z


LaLuna v. Connecticut Air Systems, Inc.
Case No. 6188 CRB-3-17-4  —  May 16, 2018


Lampo v. Angelo’s Pizza East Rock, L.L.C.
Case No. 6134 CRB-3-16-10  —  January 31, 2018


Lent v. City of Stamford
Case No. 6222 CRB-5-17-9  —  December 7, 2018


Longo v. National Express/Durham School Services
Case No. 6200 CRB-4-17-6  —  June 15, 2018

 


A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M   N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   X   Y   Z


Magistri v. New England Fitness Distributors, Inc.
Case No. 6169 CRB-2-17-1  —  January 9, 2018


McGinty v. City of Stamford Police Department
Case No. 6197 CRB-4-17-6  —  July 17, 2018


McGrath v. State of Connecticut/Western Connecticut State University
Case No. 6231 CRB-7-17-11  —  November 28, 2018


Melillo v. City of Derby
Case No. 6164 CRB-4-16-12  —  September 13, 2018

 


A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M   N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   X   Y   Z


Naveo v. Mastec, Inc.
Case No. 6219 CRB-5-17-9  —  August 30, 2018

 


A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M   N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   X   Y   Z


 

A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M   N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   X   Y   Z


Pereira v. State of Connecticut/Department of Developmental Services
Case No. 6204 CRB-3-17-6  —  August 1, 2018

 


A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M   N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   X   Y   Z


 


A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M   N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   X   Y   Z


 


A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M   N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   X   Y   Z


Salerno v. Lowe’s Home Improvement Center
Case No. 6101 CRB-6-16-5  —  November 14, 2018


Shulman v. New England Wine & Spirits, Inc.
Case No. 6236 CRB-7-17-12  —  January 17, 2018


Smith v. State of Connecticut Department of Motor Vehicles
Case No. 6196 CRB-6-17-5  —  May 30, 2018


Smith-Glasper v. State of Connecticut/Southern Connecticut State University et al.
Case No. 6179 CRB-3-17-3  —  March 22, 2018


Spillane v. Yale University
Case No. 6192 CRB-5-17-4  —  August 9, 2018


Sullivan v. Town of Clinton
Case No. 6175 CRB-3-17-1  —  August 7, 2018

 


A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M   N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   X   Y   Z


Thelors v. Jewish Home for the Elderly
Case No. 6155 CRB-4-16-11  —  April 10, 2018


Thomas v. City of Bridgeport
Case No. 6206 CRB-3-17-7  —  July 30, 2018

 


A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M   N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   X   Y   Z


 


A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M   N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   X   Y   Z


 


A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M   N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   X   Y   Z


Wetmore v. Paul Frosolone and Seasonal Services of Connecticut, L.L.C.
Case No. 6176 CRB-5-17-2  —  February 7, 2018

 


A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M   N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   X   Y   Z


 


A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M   N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   X   Y   Z


 


A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M   N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   X   Y   Z


 

 


 

The Workers' Compensation Commission recommends the use of Adobe's free Adobe Acrobat Reader software application when accessing CRB Opinions in PDF format.

Get the Adobe Acrobat Reader by clicking the following button:   Get Adobe Acrobat Reader

The Workers' Compensation Commission's recommendation of Adobe's free Adobe Acrobat Reader software application is based solely on technical considerations inherent in the PDF files this agency produces, and does not constitute an endorsement of Adobe Software as a company or of its commercially-available products. There are a multitude of free and commercial software applications offered by various software makers that are capable of opening and displaying our PDF documents, but only the Adobe Acrobat Reader application makes full and accurate use of the capabilities we have built into our documents; the agency has found over a period of many years that the Adobe Acrobat Reader provides the best, most trouble-free experience using this Commission's PDF files.