2016 CRB Opinions
pertaining to
Sec. 31-301. Appeal procedure.
Compensation Review Board opinions are presented for informational purposes only — “as is” — and the Commission makes no warranties regarding their usefulness for any given purpose. As always, the full texts of statutes, regulations, opinions, and court decisions should be consulted and all citations and references fully researched by the reader.
Alley v. Performance Landex, LLC
Case No. 6094 CRB-7-16-5 — May 12, 2016
Bond v. Lee Manufacturing, Inc. et al.
Case No. 5868 CRB-8-13-8 — April 21, 2016
Charles v. Bimbo Foods, Inc.
Case No. 5986 CRB-7-15-2 — November 30, 2016
Darrah v. Carmen Anthony Fish House
Case No. 6141 CRB-5-16-10 — October 24, 2016
Fields v. 550 Stewart Acquisitions Corporation, et al
Case No. 5993 CRB-1-15-2 — January 15, 2016
Fields v. Southern Connecticut Gas Company/United Illuminating Company
Case No. 6097 CRB-4-16-5 — May 25, 2016
Flory v. Lowe’s Distribution Center
Case No. 6143 CRB-2-16-10 — November 7, 2016
Geraldino v. Oxford Academy of Hair Design
Case No. 5968 CRB-5-14-10 — January 20, 2016
Hoetzl v. Burger King
Case No. 6162 CRB-5-16-11 — December 16, 2016
Hubbard v. Dyce Trucking, LLC
Case No. 6080 CRB-6-16-3 — October 4, 2016
Kangas v. Grade A Market, Inc.
Case No. 6121 CRB-7-16-7 — August 9, 2016
Liano v. City of Bridgeport
Case No. 6010 CRB-4-15-4 — April 22, 2016
Ojeda v. Freshpoint Connecticut, LLC
Case No. 6004 CRB-1-15-4 — March 16, 2016
Orsini v. Theis Precision Steel
Case No. 6150 CRB-6-16-11 — November 23, 2016
Rios v. Boehle’s Express
Case No. 6027 CRB-6-15-9 — June 21, 2016
Risen v. JWA Corporation
Case Nos. 5989 CRB-7-15-2 & Case No. 5862 CRB-7-13-7 — June 13, 2016
Sutherland-Hofler v. Connecticut Institute for the Blind
Case No. 6124 CRB-5-16-6 — August 26, 2016
The Workers' Compensation Commission recommends the use of Adobe's free Adobe Acrobat Reader software application when accessing CRB Opinions in PDF format.
Get the Adobe Acrobat Reader by clicking the following button: 
The Workers' Compensation Commission's recommendation of Adobe's free Adobe Acrobat Reader software application is based solely on technical considerations inherent in the PDF files this agency produces, and does not constitute an endorsement of Adobe Software as a company or of its commercially-available products. There are a multitude of free and commercial software applications offered by various software makers that are capable of opening and displaying our PDF documents, but only the Adobe Acrobat Reader application makes full and accurate use of the capabilities we have built into our documents; the agency has found over a period of many years that the Adobe Acrobat Reader provides the best, most trouble-free experience using this Commission's PDF files.