Search Results

Page 176 of 215

• Attorney General Applauds Developer’s Abandonment Of Yale Farm Golf Course Proposal

• Attorney General Announces State To Receive $104,000 In Settlement With Med Lab For Allegedly Defective Tests

• Attorney General Announces Settlement Worth $2.1 Million With Stamford Electricity Supplier

• Attorney General Announces Settlement Resolving Weight Loss And Calorie-Burning Claims About Enviga

• Attorney General Condemns Alleged Goldman Sachs Scam

• Attorney General Confirms Joint Investigation Of Westport Bank, Investment Company For Allegedly Aiding And Abetting Madoff Scam

• Attorney General Says Pratt & Whitney Proved In Court Its Own Failures To Lawfully Protect Ct Jobs

• Attorney General Seeks Confirmation Of Craigslist Adult Services Closure, Steps To Prevent Prostitution Ads Elsewhere On Site

• Attorney General Seeks Custody Of Dozens More Neglected Animals Seized From Man With Long History Of Animal Cruelty

• Attorney General Seeks Documents and Data From NewAlliance and First Niagara About Merger, Calls For Hearings and Scrutiny

• Attorney General Seeks DPUC Investigation Of Excess SCG Profits

• Attorney General Seeks From First Niagara, NewAlliance Additional Information, Justification For Proposed Merger

• Honorable Rose Alma Senatore, Department of Children and Youth Services , 1993-014 Formal Opinion, Attorney General of Connecticut

  The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) has asked for an opinion analyzing the Federal Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act (the Act) 42 U.S.C. § 5101 and regulations issued under that Act in relation to state law, particularly Conn. Gen. Stat. § l9a-570 et seq. Specifically, HHS questions whether Connecticut law meets the requirement imposed by the federal statutory mandates regarding critically-ill children.

• The Honorable Joseph M. Suggs, Jr., Office of the Treasurer, 1993-026 Formal Opinion, Attorney General of Connecticut

  This will respond to your request for advice regarding how the Second Injury Fund should proceed on the administration of Conn. Gen. Stat. §§ 31-284b, 31-349(e) and (f) in light of the United States Supreme Court's recent ruling in District of Columbia v. Greater Washington Board of Trade, _U.S._, 113 S. Ct. 580 (1992) (hereinafter referred to as Board of Trade).

• Hon. William Cibes, Office of Policy and Management, 1994-009 Formal Opinion, Attorney General of Connecticut

  You have requested an opinion as to whether proposed legislation regulating hospitals' net revenues, imposing taxes related to the provision of hospital services, and appropriating funds for Medicaid disproportionate share payments to hospitals is likely to be preempted by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 ("ERISA") because the amended statutes may "relate to" ERISA plans.