Connecticut Sentencing Task Force
OVERVIEW OF THE SENTENCING TASK FORCE
The Connecticut Sentencing Task Force was created upon passage of Public Act 06-193. This is an Act concerning Criminal Justice Policy and Planning and the establishment of a Sentencing Task Force.
See the full list of Sentencing Task Force Members.
By statute, the Research, Analysis & Evaluation unit of the Criminal Justice Policy and Planning Division provides criminal justice data, analyses, and technical assistance to carry out the task force's duties.
For more information on the Sentencing Task Force see Meeting Agendas/Minutes.
|MEETINGS AND DELIVERABLES
See the Criminal Justice Policy and Planning Calendar for meeting schedules for the full task force and its four subcommittees:
Sentencing Task Force Proposed Timeline:
|SENTENCING TASK FORCE SUBCOMMITTEES
On June 11, 2007, the Sentencing Task Force established the following four (4) subcommittees to address specific areas of interest:
|PURPOSE OF SENTENCING TASK FORCE
The primary purpose of the Connecticut Sentencing Task Force is to review criminal justice and sentencing policies and laws of this state for the purpose of creating a more just, effective and efficient system of criminal sentencing.
More specifically, the act directs the Task Force to:
(1) Identify overarching criminal justice and sentencing goals and policies;
(2) Define current sentencing models including sentencing guidelines, criteria, exemptions and enhancements;
(3) Analyze sentencing trends by offense types and offender characteristics;
(4) Review the actual versus intended impact of sentencing policies;
(5) Determine the direct and indirect costs associated with sentencing policies;
(6) Review the fines and terms of imprisonment specified for violations of criminal statutes that are classified or unclassified felonies or misdemeanors and make recommendations including, but not limited to:
(A) whether crimes that are currently unclassified should be classified;
(B) whether certain classified crimes should be reclassified or the penalties for certain unclassified crimes should be revised in order to make the penalties for similar crimes more uniform;
(C) whether the penalty or type of penalty for certain crimes should be revised or eliminated where such penalty or type of penalty is no longer deemed necessary or appropriate or is disproportionate to the severity of the crime; and
(D) whether crimes that are obsolete should be repealed.
(7) Make any recommendations for the revision of criminal justice and sentencing policies as deemed necessary.