2019 CRB Opinions
pertaining to
Sec. 31-301. Factual findings.
Compensation Review Board opinions are presented for informational purposes only — “as is” — and the Commission makes no warranties regarding their usefulness for any given purpose. As always, the full texts of statutes, regulations, opinions, and court decisions should be consulted and all citations and references fully researched by the reader.
Arlio v. Trumbull
Case No. 6284 CRB 4-18-8 — July 25, 2019
Ayala-Lopez v. FMP Transport, L.L.C.
Case No. 6275 CRB-4-18-5 — May 23, 2019
Ayna v. Graebel/CT Movers, Inc.
Case No. 6214 CRB 7-17-8 — March 6, 2019
Biggs v. Combined Insurance Company of America
Case No. 6247 CRB 7-18-2 — April 12, 2019
Collin v. United Technologies Corp.
Case No. 6278 CRB-8-18-5 — May 13, 2019
Coughlin v. City of Stamford Fire Department
Case No. 6218 CRB-5-17-9 — February 15, 2019
DeLorge v. Norwich
Case No. 6286 CRB-2-18-8 — August 5, 2019
DeMattia v. Dunkin Donuts
Case No. 6289 CRB 4-18-9 — August 27, 2019
Dominguez-Sanchez v. Ta Caislean, Inc.
Case No. 6266 CRB-5-18-4 — March 28, 2019
Frantzen v. Davenport Electric
Case No. 6091 CRB-4-16-4 — November 4, 2019
Greco v. Precision Devices, Inc.
Case No. 6265 CRB-8-18-4 — June 17, 2019
Hyde v. Branson UltraSonics Corp.
Case No. 6282 CRB-7-18-7 — July 10, 2019
Lefevre v. TPC Associates, Inc.
Case No. 6255 CRB-4-18-3 — March 26, 2019
Mauriello v. Craftsmen Litho
Case No. 6256 CRB-5-18-3 — March 22, 2019
Mellado v. Anthony Urbano/Earth Materials, L.L.C.
Case No. 6187 CRB-3-17-4 — January 15, 2019
Morton v. Express Employment Services
Case No. 6300 CRB-8-18-12 — October 31, 2019
Perry v. Danbury
Case No. 6209 CRB-4-17-8 — February 25, 2019
Rock v. University of Connecticut
Case No. 6237 CRB-8-18-1 — October 17, 2019
Shelesky v. Community Systems, Inc.
Case No. 6263 CRB-5-18-4 — July 3, 2019
Tanner v. Murace Plumbing Co., Inc.
Case No. 6279 CRB-4-18-6 — June 13, 2019
Wilson v. Stamford
Case No. 6309 CRB 7-19-2 — December 13, 2019
The Workers' Compensation Commission recommends the use of Adobe's free Adobe Acrobat Reader software application when accessing CRB Opinions in PDF format.
Get the Adobe Acrobat Reader by clicking the following button: 
The Workers' Compensation Commission's recommendation of Adobe's free Adobe Acrobat Reader software application is based solely on technical considerations inherent in the PDF files this agency produces, and does not constitute an endorsement of Adobe Software as a company or of its commercially-available products. There are a multitude of free and commercial software applications offered by various software makers that are capable of opening and displaying our PDF documents, but only the Adobe Acrobat Reader application makes full and accurate use of the capabilities we have built into our documents; the agency has found over a period of many years that the Adobe Acrobat Reader provides the best, most trouble-free experience using this Commission's PDF files.