The above-captioned matter was heard as a contested case on May 11, 2015, at which time the complainant and the respondents appeared and presented testimony, exhibits and argument on the complaint. 

     After consideration of the entire record, the following facts are found and conclusions of law are reached:

     1.  The respondents are public agencies within the meaning of §1-200(1), G.S.

     2.  By email, dated and filed November 13, 2014, the complainant appealed to this Commission, alleging that the respondents violated the Freedom of Information (“FOI”) Act by failing to make available the minutes of the October 30, 2014 meeting of the respondent Board of Selectmen (“board”) in the town clerk’s office and on the town’s website, within seven days of such meeting.  The complainant further alleged that the respondents failed to make available, within 48 hours, the record of the votes taken at the October 30, 2014 meeting of the board.

     3.  It is found that, on October 30, 2014, the board held a regular meeting (“meeting”).  It is found that handwritten minutes of the meeting were taken during the meeting by an administrative assistant to the first selectman.  It is found that a record of the votes taken at the meeting were included in such minutes.  It is found that the handwritten minutes were available for public inspection in the office of the first selectman, located in the town hall, within 48 hours of the meeting.

     4.  It is found that, on November 13, 2014, the complainant searched for the minutes of the meeting on the town’s website, and did not find them.  It is found that, on or about November 7, 2014, another resident of the town, who testified as a witness at the hearing in this matter, appeared in person at the town clerk’s office, requested to inspect the minutes of the meeting, and was told that the minutes had not yet been filed.  It is found that the typewritten minutes of the meeting were filed with the town clerk on November 19, 2014.

     5.  Section 1-225, G.S., provides in relevant part that:

     6.  Section 1-210(a), G.S., provides in relevant part that:

     7.  Although §1-225(a), G.S., does not specify the location where the minutes and the votes are to be made available, §1-210(a), G.S., requires a public agency to keep and maintain all of its public records in its custody at its regular office or place of business, if the agency has such office or place of business.  It is concluded that a public agency that maintains a regular office or place of business is required to make the record of the votes and the minutes of its meetings available at such office or place of business within the specified time frames, and that the law does not require such public agency to make such votes and minutes available in the office of the town clerk.

     8.  It is further concluded that the board is not required to post the minutes of its meetings on the town’s website.   

     9.  Based upon the foregoing, it is concluded that the respondents did not violate the FOI Act, as alleged in the complaint.

     The following order by the Commission is hereby recommended on the basis of the record concerning the above-captioned complaint:

     1.  The complaint is dismissed.

Approved by Order of the Freedom of Information Commission at its regular meeting of July 22, 2015.

__________________________
Cynthia A. Cannata
Acting Clerk of the Commission

PURSUANT TO SECTION 4-180(c), G.S., THE FOLLOWING ARE THE NAMES OF EACH PARTY AND THE MOST RECENT MAILING ADDRESS, PROVIDED TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION COMMISSION, OF THE PARTIES OR THEIR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE.

THE PARTIES TO THIS CONTESTED CASE ARE:

Kelle Giachello
118 Stafford Road
Somers, CT 

Board of Selectmen, Town of
Somers; and Town of Somers
c/o Carl T. Landolina, Esq.
Fahey & Landolina, Attorneys LLC
487 Spring Street
Windsor Locks, CT  06096

____________________________
Cynthia A. Cannata
Acting Clerk of the Commission

FIC/2014-827/FD/cac/7/22/2015