Quick Results from April 28, 2011
Quick results are not to be mistaken for minutes. An official decision letter will be sent to all concerned with instructions from the Board on how to proceed.
1) Case No. 10-258-R, Randall Fitzpatrick, represent by Ralph D. Sherman
vs. Commissioner Rueben F. Bradford, Dept. of Public Safety
The appellant, Mr. Fitzpatrick through Attorney Ralph D. Sherman and the State Issuing Authority, Commissioner Reuben F. Bradford, Department of Public Safety, agreed the appellant will be reissued his permit on July 13, 2011, so long as there are no other incidents that are detrimental to his suitability.
2) Case No. 10-271-R, John Okolvitch, represented by Atty. Vincent L. Noce, Jr.
vs. Commissioner Rueben F. Bradford, Dept. of Public Safety
Decision for Commissioner Rueben F. Bradford, Dept. of Public Safety at this time.
3) Case No. 10-216-R, Jeremy Rankin
vs. Commissioner Rueben F. Bradford, Dept. of Public Safety
Decision for Commissioner Rueben F. Bradford, Dept. of Public Safety, by default due to the appellants, Mr. Rankin, failure to appear.
4) Case No. 10-253-R, Michael Molnar
vs. Commissioner Rueben F. Bradford, Dept. of Public Safety
Decision for Commissioner Rueben F. Bradford, Dept. of Public Safety, by default due to the appellants, Mr. Molnar, failure to appear.
5) Case No. 10-262-R, William Mike
vs. Commissioner Rueben F. Bradford, Dept. of Public Safety
The appellant, Mr. Mike, withdrew his appeal due to a pending protective order and may reapply for a new pistol permit once his situation is resolved.
6) Case No. 10-279-R, James Gigliotti
vs. Commissioner Rueben F. Bradford, Dept. of Public Safety
The appellant, Mr. Gigliotti, withdrew his appeal due to a pending criminal case and may reapply for a new pistol permit once his situation is resolved.
7) Case No. 10-265-D, Justin Peters
vs. Chief Louis Fusaro, Norwich Police Department
Decision in favor of the appellant, Mr. Peters.
8) Case No. 10-288-D, Robert Blouin
vs. former Chief Drumm, Madison Police Department
Decision in favor of the appellant, Mr. Blouin.
9) Case No. 10-263-D, Tikkie Woods
vs. Chief Frank Limon, New Haven Police Department
Decision in favor of the appellant, Mr. Woods, by default as the local Issuing Authority, due to Chief Limon, New Haven Police Department or a representatives failure to appear.
10) Case No. 10-268-D, Michael Pepe, represented by Ralph D. Sherman
vs. Chief John Daly, Southington Police Department
The appellant’s attorney, Ralph D. Sherman, appeared before the Board on behalf of his cleint. He informed the Board and provided proof that his client was ill. In agreement with a representative of the local Issuing Authority, Southington Police Department, Mr. Pepe was granted a continuance to July 14, 2011.
11) Case No. 10-252-D, Andrew Klotsche
vs. Chief James DiCarlo, North Haven Police Department
An agreement was reached between the appellant, Mr. Klotsche, and the local Issuing Authority represented by Sgt. Mark Kirschner to issue a temporary permit by May 15, 2011 or earlier, once the appellant provides a copy of his employer’s drug testing policy.