As of September 5, 2022, Freedom of Information Commission meetings and contested case hearings will resume being conducted in person. All parties and witnesses must appear in person for their contested case hearings and Commission meetings. Please access this link or contact the Commission for further information.

The following summary of  Public Act No. 12-3 (the new provisions of C.G.S. §1-217) was drafted by counsel at the FOIC.   It is provided only as a guide.  While every effort has been made to ensure an accurate interpretation of its provisions, the public is encouraged to consult an official copy of the public act.
Changes to Gen. Stat. §1-217 by Public Act No. 12-3:
A Primer

I.     The 12 categories of protected government employees remain the same.  Section 1-217 applies only to these categories of employees, not to all public employees. 
II. Land records (Gen. Stat. §7-35bb), voter lists (Title 9), and grand lists (Gen. Stat. §12-55) are no longer subject to the nondisclosure requirements of §1-217.   
III. All other records are permitted to be disclosed without redaction of residential addresses, except for the following:
     (A)  A public agency must redact the residential addresses contained in the personnel, medical and similar files of the agency’s employees who are members of one of the protected groups. 
          1. Applies only to an agency employee who is a member of one of the 12 categories, not all public employees.
          2. Applies even without affirmative notification by employee that she/he is a member of a protected class and does not want residential address disclosed.
          3.   Court decisions have defined personnel and similar files to be those that are used to make employment related decisions; files are similar to medical files if they are used to make medical related decisions.
          4. Disclosure of personnel, medical, or similar files pursuant to some other law or order (such as in a deposition, in court, to another agency as required by a law other than the FOI Act), does not trigger the prohibitions of §1-217.
     (B) A public agency shall redact a protected person’s residential address from a record to  be disclosed in response to a FOI request that “specifically names” a person who has requested address confidentiality under §1-217, where the protected person has:
          1. submitted a written request for nondisclosure to such public agency, and
          2. furnished his or her business address to such public agency.
     (C)   A public agency shall make a “reasonable effort” to redact a protected person’s residential address from a record to be disclosed in response to a FOI request where the protected person has:
          1. submitted a written request for nondisclosure to such public agency, and
          2. furnished his or her business address to such public agency; and

          3. the request:
               a. is for an existing list derived from a searchable electronic database
                              (“readily accessible”); OR
               b.   is for any list that the agency “voluntarily creates” in response to a FOI request for disclosure.
IV. The business address is always subject to disclosure. Section 1-217 applies only to residential addresses.
V. Penalty Provisions:
     (A) As with all other alleged violations of the FOI Act, the FOIC is the exclusive body to adjudicate complaints.
     (B)  “Willful and knowing” standard.  This means that a violation of the FOI Act is found only where a public agency, official, or employee knows that §1-217 protects a residential address from disclosure, as described in paragraph III (A), (B), and (C), above, and intentionally discloses the address anyway.  There is no violation for mistakes or errors, even if the agency or official should have known that the address was protected.
     (C)  Where the FOIC finds a willful and knowing violation, the FOIC has discretion whether to impose a civil penalty and the amount of any penalty (between $20 and $1,000).
     (D)  Section 1-217 does not permit a private right of action against the public agency, official or employee of such agency for wrongful disclosure; that is, §1-217 does not permit a protected person to sue a public agency, official or employee for violating §1-217.
VI. Other provisions:
     (A)  Department of Labor to create a guide that instructs protected employees how to exercise their rights under §1-217.  Guide to be completed by May 6, 2012 (sixty days from passage), within available appropriations.
     (B)  Legislature to establish an advisory committee to study whether there are alternatives to permitting the disclosure of certain records without redaction.
     (C) Members of such advisory committee to be appointed by the chairs of the legislature’s Government Administration and Elections Committee.  Committee shall submit a report on its findings and recommendations no later than January 1, 2013, and shall then terminate.
*  This explanation of §1-217, as amended by P.A. 12-3, is unofficial and for the convenience of the public only. While every effort was made to attain complete accuracy herein, the reader is advised to consult the Connecticut General Statutes for the official codification of the law.