PLEASE CONTACT THE BOARD IMMEDIATELY IF YOUR PERMIT WAS ISSUED OR REINSTATED PRIOR TO YOUR HEARING. THIS WILL REDUCE THE BACKLOG.

Quick Results December 8, 2011

Case No. 11-142-R, Sean Booska

vs. Commissioner vs. Commissioner Rueben F. Bradford, Dept. of Emergency Services and Public Protection   

Decision for the State Issuing Authority, Commissioner Bradford, at this time 

Case No. 11-194-D, Janusz Zdanowski

vs. Chief William A. Gagliardi, New Britain Police Department

Decision for the appellant, Mr. Zdanowski

Case No. 11-92-R, Harry Dunkley, Jr.

vs. Commissioner vs. Commissioner Rueben F. Bradford, Dept. of Emergency Services and Public Protection   

Mr. Dunkley, Jr. withdrew his appeal due to an active protective order

Case No. 11-183-R, Marven Moss

vs. Commissioner vs. Commissioner Rueben F. Bradford, Dept. of Emergency Services and Public Protection

Decision for the State Issuing Authority, Commissioner Bradford, at this time 

Case No. 11-141-R, Angel Soto

vs. Commissioner vs. Commissioner Rueben F. Bradford, Dept. of Emergency Services and Public Protection

Decision for the State Issuing Authority, Commissioner Bradford, by default for the appellant’s failure to appear  

Case No. 11-168-R, Robert Koether

vs. Commissioner vs. Commissioner Rueben F. Bradford, Dept. of Emergency Services and Public Protection

Decision for the State Issuing Authority, Commissioner Bradford, at this time 

Case No. 11-263-D, Carlos Sanchez

vs. Chief Robert Nivakoff, Stamford Police Department

Decision for the local Issuing Authority, Chief Nivakoff, Stamford Police Dept. due to Mr. Sanchez’s felony conviction

Case No. 11-200-D, Elaine Casey

vs. Chief John Karajanis, Jr., West Haven Police Department

Decision for the appellant, Ms. Casey, by default, due to the local Issuing Authority’s failure to appear

Case No. 11-251-D, Joao Da Silva

vs. Chief John Karajanis, Jr., Avon Police Department

Decision for the appellant, Joao Da Silva, by default, due to the local Issuing Authority, Avon Police Department, failing to provide the written statement as to why the appellant was denied, 10 days prior to the hearing in accordance with C.G.S. 29-32b(c)

Case No. 11-228-D, Joseph Champagne

vs. First Selectman Richard Shuck,Town of Stafford

Decision for the appellant, Mr. Champagne, by default, due to the local Issuing Authority’s failure to appear