Complaint Summary
Date Findings Report Sent:
December 15, 2025
Case Number:
26-0206
Grade Level:
Elementary
Person filing complaint:
Parent
School District:
Fairfield Public Schools
Allegation(s):
- 34 CFR § 300.320(a)(1) failure to include in the IEP (1) a statement of the child’s present levels of academic achievement and functional performance, including (i) how the child’s disability affects the child’s involvement and progress in the general education curriculum (i.e., the same curriculum as for nondisabled children).
- 34 CFR § 300.324(b)(1)(ii) failure to revise the IEP, as appropriate, to address (A) any lack of expected progress toward the annual goals described in §300.320(a)(2), and in the general education curriculum, if appropriate.
Conclusion(s):
- It is the responsibility of the PPT meeting to determine each student’s individual needs, reflect the required services within the IEP, and document any resulting removal from the general education environment. Through the course of this investigation, it was found that the Student remains in her general education classroom outside of designated special education service hours. However, this arrangement results in the general education teacher providing concurrent instruction in at least two subject areas (i.e., the Student working on missed writing instruction from the morning while her peers engage in science or social studies). While the District is not in violation of 34 CFR § 300.320(a)(1) or 34 CFR § 300.324(b)(1)(ii), this practice may have a quantifiable impact on the Student’s access to general education curriculum.
Corrective Action(s):
- No required corrective actions.
Recommendation:
- The District should ensure that PPT meetings facilitate transparent communication regarding the delivery of special education services and any potential impact on the Student’s access to the general education curriculum. PPTs should evaluate the Student’s disability and corresponding instructional needs in the least restrictive environment, carefully considering the use of supplementary aids and services to prevent unnecessary limitations on access to general education programming. Additionally, the District should not only monitor but also analyze the Student’s progress toward their IEP goals and objectives, as well as their performance within in the general education curriculum, to inform and adjust instructional strategies and scheduling decisions as appropriate.