Connecticut State Council on Developmental Disabilities

Proposal Review Recommendations 1-30-18

From:                                           Kucharczykr Alicia H.

Sent:                                           Tuesday, January 30. 2018 3:20 PM

To:                                                 Glomb, Walterr Shelagh McClure (shelaghpmccrure@gmail.com)

Cc:                               Richardson, Patricia: Megan O'Neill (meganjoneill©gmail.com); James Herter

(jamesThexter@gmail.com); Jim Rosen (jrosen©bethelwh.org)

 

                                              Subject: Proposal Review Recommendations 1/30/18 [not-secure].

Good Afternoon,

Please see feedback regarding both proposals reviewed today. The committee has requested clarification from People First and voted to table a decision until additional information is received, We encourage People First to get the information to the DO Council by February, so that the Council can make a decision in March at our next meeting. The committee has reviewed and approved the proposal from UMKC/IHD for $25,000 and recommends that the council chair and director approve as recommended.

1. People First Request

a. Request for Clarification

                        I. Please State Objectives, themes, materials developed for the conference so that the Council has a sense for global plan on the conference and general   idea of direction of the conference.
  1. There is a $425 discrepancy between itemized budget addendum in proposal sent to DO Council. Request for clarification.
  2. Request for overview of Transportation Initiative and clarification on goals
  3. Request for overview of Leadership Training Retreat and breakdown of goals as it aligns with our State Plan. Is this inclusive of people with disabilities?
  4. Clarification of accommodations cost, $375 doesn't match the budgeted amount- does this include interpreters etc? If yes, review amount for accuracy
  5. General overview request of itemized list of costs

b. Motion request to table the proposal until additional information 15 obtained for clarification.

2. Charting the LifeCourse

  1. Request for update on deliverables and information regarding those who are trained. Surveys with data on evaluation on quality of training they have received
  2. Request that as part of registration process, we hold expectation that those trained would utilize skill set moving forward in a professional capacity

Thank you,

Proposal Review Committee