ATTORNEY GENERAL TONG ISSUES STATEMENT ON TRUMP ADMINISTRATION’S ROLLBACK OF CLEAN CAR RULE
Attorney General William Tong joined 11 other attorneys general today in submitting a comment letter to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency in response to the agency's rollback of the Clean Car standards, which will significantly weaken pollution standards for automobiles nationwide.
"As the Trump Administration continues to ignore one of the most significant challenges of our time, Connecticut won't back down when it comes to standing up for clean air and fighting climate change. Reducing greenhouse gas emissions isn't a choice, it's integral to protecting the health and well-being of all citizens and future generations. I stand with 11 other states across the country in staunch opposition to the rollback of the Clean Car standards which will only expose our communities to harmful pollutants," said Attorney General Tong.
In their proposal to rollback federal Clean Car Rules (GHG standards and fuel economy standards), the EPA and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) also propose to preempt states from maintaining their own more stringent standards.
The agencies falsely asserted they had complied with state consultation requirements of a longstanding Executive Order requiring federal agencies proposing a rule that will preempt state law to consult with states early in the process of developing the proposal.
The EPA/NHTSA Clean Car rollback proposed state preemption would have substantial impact on the preempted states both by:
1) Revoking California’s waiver under the federal Clean Air Act to adopt and enforce more stringent vehicle emission standards than those adopted nationally, which would thereby also preempt the 12 states, including Connecticut, that follow California’s lead; and
2) Asserting that the states’ separate Clean Car standards are preempted by the statute under which NHTSA sets fuel economy standards.
The EPA went even further, and has proposed that states are preempted from adopting California’s standards even if California’s standards were to remain un-preempted.
At the time EPA/NHTSA proposed the rollback and asserted the compliance with the Executive Order, the states in the coalition had no knowledge of ever being consulted on the proposed preemption by EPA/NHTSA, so the states requested documents under the federal Freedom of Information Act for any records supporting such consultation. In its much-delayed FOIA response whereby the states sued to compel the agency to respond, the agencies provided no records of any consultation with any state of the rollback proposal’s preemption.
The comments filed today request that EPA/NHSTA withdraw the rollback rule and comply with the Executive Order’s consultation requirement before issuing another rule and that EPA/NHSTA correct the public record to reflect that they, in fact, did not comply with the Executive Order.
The states that submitted the comments include Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Vermont, and Washington.